Comments on: Ending Global Poverty? Seriously? http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/16/ending-global-poverty-seriously/ Discussing the people, ideas, and companies that redefine capitalism and inspire positive change Sat, 19 May 2012 05:59:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: cheap solar panels http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/16/ending-global-poverty-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-21563 cheap solar panels Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:37:50 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=712#comment-21563 I think this is a good idea, but I am not sure it is so simple. I also think that first world countries are going to be more opposed to this as their economies are not currently very strong. I think this is a good idea, but I am not sure it is so simple. I also think that first world countries are going to be more opposed to this as their economies are not currently very strong.

]]> By: cheap solar panels http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/16/ending-global-poverty-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-37546 cheap solar panels Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:37:00 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=712#comment-37546 I think this is a good idea, but I am not sure it is so simple. I also think that first world countries are going to be more opposed to this as their economies are not currently very strong. I think this is a good idea, but I am not sure it is so simple. I also think that first world countries are going to be more opposed to this as their economies are not currently very strong.

]]> By: Uncle B http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/16/ending-global-poverty-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-3524 Uncle B Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:30:10 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=712#comment-3524 So drenched in capitalistic mumbo-jumbo and Multi-national propaganda as to make one puke! Is Wolf Blitzer of CNN you co-writer, American gringo? So drenched in capitalistic mumbo-jumbo and Multi-national propaganda as to make one puke! Is Wolf Blitzer of CNN you co-writer, American gringo?

]]> By: Uncle B http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/16/ending-global-poverty-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-37545 Uncle B Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:30:00 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=712#comment-37545 So drenched in capitalistic mumbo-jumbo and Multi-national propaganda as to make one puke! Is Wolf Blitzer of CNN you co-writer, American gringo? So drenched in capitalistic mumbo-jumbo and Multi-national propaganda as to make one puke! Is Wolf Blitzer of CNN you co-writer, American gringo?

]]> By: MICHAEL J. SCHMITZ http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/16/ending-global-poverty-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-1696 MICHAEL J. SCHMITZ Fri, 26 Dec 2008 03:51:49 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=712#comment-1696 WHERE'S MY COMMENT? WHERE’S MY COMMENT?

]]> By: rizzy http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/16/ending-global-poverty-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-1576 rizzy Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:08:39 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=712#comment-1576 Impossible. Regards: rizzy http://twitter.com/rizzy81 Impossible.
Regards: rizzy
http://twitter.com/rizzy81

]]> By: rizzy http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/16/ending-global-poverty-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-37544 rizzy Sun, 21 Dec 2008 19:08:00 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=712#comment-37544 Impossible. Regards: rizzy http://twitter.com/rizzy81 Impossible.
Regards: rizzy
http://twitter.com/rizzy81

]]> By: Puspa http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/16/ending-global-poverty-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-212 Puspa Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:55:49 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=712#comment-212 The point is that if the standards would be lower, developing countries could experience an increase in agricultural commodity exports. Therefore, the next step is that the developed countries, on the one hand should not set their standards arbitrarily above international standards, and on the other provide financial and technical assistance to developing countries to help them standardize those products that are below standards in relation to living-beings' health. The point is that if the standards would be lower, developing countries could experience an increase in agricultural commodity exports. Therefore, the next step is that the developed countries, on the one hand should not set their standards arbitrarily above international standards, and on the other provide financial and technical assistance to developing countries to help them standardize those products that are below standards in relation to living-beings’ health.

]]> By: Puspa http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/16/ending-global-poverty-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-37543 Puspa Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:55:00 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=712#comment-37543 The point is that if the standards would be lower, developing countries could experience an increase in agricultural commodity exports. Therefore, the next step is that the developed countries, on the one hand should not set their standards arbitrarily above international standards, and on the other provide financial and technical assistance to developing countries to help them standardize those products that are below standards in relation to living-beings' health. The point is that if the standards would be lower, developing countries could experience an increase in agricultural commodity exports. Therefore, the next step is that the developed countries, on the one hand should not set their standards arbitrarily above international standards, and on the other provide financial and technical assistance to developing countries to help them standardize those products that are below standards in relation to living-beings’ health.

]]> By: N Dog http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/16/ending-global-poverty-seriously/comment-page-1/#comment-209 N Dog Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:56:03 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=712#comment-209 If I read this correctly (please excuse my lack of knowledge on this one), lowering standards would allow an expediential supply of food but at a loss that is far less? Pretty interesting way to look at it. What is the next step? If I read this correctly (please excuse my lack of knowledge on this one), lowering standards would allow an expediential supply of food but at a loss that is far less?

Pretty interesting way to look at it. What is the next step?

]]>