http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/22/to-bailout-or-not-to-bailout-is-free-market-economics-sustainable/ Discussing the people, ideas, and companies that redefine capitalism and inspire positive change Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:43:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/22/to-bailout-or-not-to-bailout-is-free-market-economics-sustainable/comment-page-1/#comment-943 Introducing Obama’s Economic Team for A Sustainable America : The Inspired Economist Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:33:17 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=725#comment-943 [...] top financial authority, Geithner will inherit oversight of the Bush administration’s $700 billion bailout for Wall Street and a U.S. economy struggling with recession. [...] [...] top financial authority, Geithner will inherit oversight of the Bush administration’s $700 billion bailout for Wall Street and a U.S. economy struggling with recession. [...]

]]> http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/22/to-bailout-or-not-to-bailout-is-free-market-economics-sustainable/comment-page-1/#comment-374 The Future of Home Solar Power: Costs, Tax Breaks, and Return on Investment : Green Building Elements Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:19:47 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=725#comment-374 [...] in the fine print of the massive Wall Street Bailout bill that was signed into law last week was a tax credit extension that had alternative energy [...] [...] in the fine print of the massive Wall Street Bailout bill that was signed into law last week was a tax credit extension that had alternative energy [...]

]]> http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/22/to-bailout-or-not-to-bailout-is-free-market-economics-sustainable/comment-page-1/#comment-331 Supply Side Economics: Transforming Carbon Emissions Into Useful Products : The Inspired Economist Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:32:55 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=725#comment-331 [...] $700 billion bailout package recently issued by the U.S. government favors supply-side economics. The bailout package [...] [...] $700 billion bailout package recently issued by the U.S. government favors supply-side economics. The bailout package [...]

]]> http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/22/to-bailout-or-not-to-bailout-is-free-market-economics-sustainable/comment-page-1/#comment-254 What Is the The Value of Water: An Online Debate By The Economist : The Inspired Economist Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:35:06 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=725#comment-254 [...] To Bailout or Not to Bailout: Is Free Market Economics Sustainable? [...] [...] To Bailout or Not to Bailout: Is Free Market Economics Sustainable? [...]

]]> http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/22/to-bailout-or-not-to-bailout-is-free-market-economics-sustainable/comment-page-1/#comment-200 Sustainability and Google’s 10th Anniversary : The Inspired Economist Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:31:45 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=725#comment-200 [...] Don’t Stop Now:  See what my colleagues have written on this issue: To Bailout or Not to Bailout:  Is Free Market Economics Sustainable? [...] [...] Don’t Stop Now:  See what my colleagues have written on this issue: To Bailout or Not to Bailout:  Is Free Market Economics Sustainable? [...]

]]> http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/22/to-bailout-or-not-to-bailout-is-free-market-economics-sustainable/comment-page-1/#comment-183 Bo Barkley Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:02:57 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=725#comment-183 With respect to the "The Taxpayer is affected" portion, it's only fair to note that currently the tax-payer is feeling the biggest effect initially, the tax payer is also the one who stands to make out the best. This Take over is not meant to be a long term solution and according to the fed their intention to sell back the entities, under new management over the course of several years. Like anything, Fannie and Freddie are not getting out of this to for free, their will clearly be paying huge sums of money over the long term for this, so in effect, the Fed has become a Real Estate investor. Say what you will about weather the Fed should be gambling our money, but in the end, the tax payer potentially comes out on top. With respect to the “The Taxpayer is affected” portion, it’s only fair to note that currently the tax-payer is feeling the biggest effect initially, the tax payer is also the one who stands to make out the best. This Take over is not meant to be a long term solution and according to the fed their intention to sell back the entities, under new management over the course of several years. Like anything, Fannie and Freddie are not getting out of this to for free, their will clearly be paying huge sums of money over the long term for this, so in effect, the Fed has become a Real Estate investor. Say what you will about weather the Fed should be gambling our money, but in the end, the tax payer potentially comes out on top.

]]> http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/22/to-bailout-or-not-to-bailout-is-free-market-economics-sustainable/comment-page-1/#comment-37552 Bo Barkley Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:02:00 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=725#comment-37552 With respect to the "The Taxpayer is affected" portion, it's only fair to note that currently the tax-payer is feeling the biggest effect initially, the tax payer is also the one who stands to make out the best. This Take over is not meant to be a long term solution and according to the fed their intention to sell back the entities, under new management over the course of several years. Like anything, Fannie and Freddie are not getting out of this to for free, their will clearly be paying huge sums of money over the long term for this, so in effect, the Fed has become a Real Estate investor. Say what you will about weather the Fed should be gambling our money, but in the end, the tax payer potentially comes out on top. With respect to the “The Taxpayer is affected” portion, it’s only fair to note that currently the tax-payer is feeling the biggest effect initially, the tax payer is also the one who stands to make out the best. This Take over is not meant to be a long term solution and according to the fed their intention to sell back the entities, under new management over the course of several years. Like anything, Fannie and Freddie are not getting out of this to for free, their will clearly be paying huge sums of money over the long term for this, so in effect, the Fed has become a Real Estate investor. Say what you will about weather the Fed should be gambling our money, but in the end, the tax payer potentially comes out on top.

]]>