Comments on: Business Growth and Competition : New Financial Architecture Required http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/13/business-growth-and-competition-new-economic-architecture-required/ Discussing the people, ideas, and companies that redefine capitalism and inspire positive change Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:43:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Private Label Rights http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/13/business-growth-and-competition-new-economic-architecture-required/comment-page-1/#comment-14392 Private Label Rights Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:20:37 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=774#comment-14392 I love your posts! Please write more often if you can I love your posts! Please write more often if you can

]]> By: Private Label Rights http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/13/business-growth-and-competition-new-economic-architecture-required/comment-page-1/#comment-37630 Private Label Rights Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:20:00 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=774#comment-37630 I love your posts! Please write more often if you can I love your posts! Please write more often if you can

]]> By: Ben http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/13/business-growth-and-competition-new-economic-architecture-required/comment-page-1/#comment-14266 Ben Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:27:39 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=774#comment-14266 Your argument seems to be based on a false premise. Consumers GIVE money to companies. Governments TAKE money from people. Also you seem to base your argument on the fact that everything is a win lose (0 sum) situation. markets are not finite. If that were the case we would all be living at caveman standards. Free enterprise has shown that markets are not finite, they have been expanding and raising living standards since the idea of a free market came into being. Companies grow large because they provide value to consumers. If they didn't provide value no one would give them any money. and If they stop providing value people stop giving them money and they change or go out of business. Its not until you throw regulation in to the system that this process stops working. regulation makes it much harder for new competition to sprout up to take market share from the larger company that is no longer working as well as it could. And governments arent bullied by anybody. When you have that many guns no one can mess with you. And too big to fail is politician speak for I have a ton of vested interest in this company, so I'm going to give other peoples money to them so I don't lose any thing. Your argument seems to be based on a false premise. Consumers GIVE money to companies. Governments TAKE money from people. Also you seem to base your argument on the fact that everything is a win lose (0 sum) situation. markets are not finite. If that were the case we would all be living at caveman standards. Free enterprise has shown that markets are not finite, they have been expanding and raising living standards since the idea of a free market came into being.

Companies grow large because they provide value to consumers. If they didn’t provide value no one would give them any money. and If they stop providing value people stop giving them money and they change or go out of business. Its not until you throw regulation in to the system that this process stops working. regulation makes it much harder for new competition to sprout up to take market share from the larger company that is no longer working as well as it could.

And governments arent bullied by anybody. When you have that many guns no one can mess with you. And too big to fail is politician speak for I have a ton of vested interest in this company, so I’m going to give other peoples money to them so I don’t lose any thing.

]]> By: Ben http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/13/business-growth-and-competition-new-economic-architecture-required/comment-page-1/#comment-37629 Ben Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:27:00 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=774#comment-37629 Your argument seems to be based on a false premise. Consumers GIVE money to companies. Governments TAKE money from people. Also you seem to base your argument on the fact that everything is a win lose (0 sum) situation. markets are not finite. If that were the case we would all be living at caveman standards. Free enterprise has shown that markets are not finite, they have been expanding and raising living standards since the idea of a free market came into being. Companies grow large because they provide value to consumers. If they didn't provide value no one would give them any money. and If they stop providing value people stop giving them money and they change or go out of business. Its not until you throw regulation in to the system that this process stops working. regulation makes it much harder for new competition to sprout up to take market share from the larger company that is no longer working as well as it could. And governments arent bullied by anybody. When you have that many guns no one can mess with you. And too big to fail is politician speak for I have a ton of vested interest in this company, so I'm going to give other peoples money to them so I don't lose any thing. Your argument seems to be based on a false premise. Consumers GIVE money to companies. Governments TAKE money from people. Also you seem to base your argument on the fact that everything is a win lose (0 sum) situation. markets are not finite. If that were the case we would all be living at caveman standards. Free enterprise has shown that markets are not finite, they have been expanding and raising living standards since the idea of a free market came into being.

Companies grow large because they provide value to consumers. If they didn’t provide value no one would give them any money. and If they stop providing value people stop giving them money and they change or go out of business. Its not until you throw regulation in to the system that this process stops working. regulation makes it much harder for new competition to sprout up to take market share from the larger company that is no longer working as well as it could.

And governments arent bullied by anybody. When you have that many guns no one can mess with you. And too big to fail is politician speak for I have a ton of vested interest in this company, so I’m going to give other peoples money to them so I don’t lose any thing.

]]> By: PLR Products http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/13/business-growth-and-competition-new-economic-architecture-required/comment-page-1/#comment-12241 PLR Products Sat, 25 Jul 2009 05:05:38 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=774#comment-12241 I'm not doubting what you say is true - but how can it be proven? I’m not doubting what you say is true – but how can it be proven?

]]> By: PLR Products http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/13/business-growth-and-competition-new-economic-architecture-required/comment-page-1/#comment-37628 PLR Products Sat, 25 Jul 2009 05:05:00 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=774#comment-37628 I'm not doubting what you say is true - but how can it be proven? I’m not doubting what you say is true – but how can it be proven?

]]> By: yum cheng http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/13/business-growth-and-competition-new-economic-architecture-required/comment-page-1/#comment-10016 yum cheng Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:57:30 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=774#comment-10016 It was interesting to browse trough :-) keep up the good work and thanks for sharing. It was interesting to browse trough :-) keep up the good work and thanks for sharing.

]]> By: yum cheng http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/13/business-growth-and-competition-new-economic-architecture-required/comment-page-1/#comment-37627 yum cheng Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:57:00 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=774#comment-37627 It was interesting to browse trough :-) keep up the good work and thanks for sharing. It was interesting to browse trough :-) keep up the good work and thanks for sharing.

]]> By: yum cheng http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/13/business-growth-and-competition-new-economic-architecture-required/comment-page-1/#comment-9839 yum cheng Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:13:37 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=774#comment-9839 It was interesting to read trough :-) keep up the good work and thanks for all the tips. It was interesting to read trough :-) keep up the good work and thanks for all the tips.

]]> By: yum cheng http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/13/business-growth-and-competition-new-economic-architecture-required/comment-page-1/#comment-37626 yum cheng Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:13:00 +0000 http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=774#comment-37626 It was interesting to read trough :-) keep up the good work and thanks for all the tips. It was interesting to read trough :-) keep up the good work and thanks for all the tips.

]]>