<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Terrorism Have An Economic Motive?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/11/30/does-terrorism-have-an-economic-motive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/11/30/does-terrorism-have-an-economic-motive/</link>
	<description>Discussing the people, ideas, and companies that redefine capitalism and inspire positive change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheap calls to Sri Lanka</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/11/30/does-terrorism-have-an-economic-motive/comment-page-1/#comment-28053</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap calls to Sri Lanka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=926#comment-28053</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. Sri Lanka is lovely country and I hope that it is protected and always nice. If African countries had more money many of the troubles would not happen, just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. Sri Lanka is lovely country and I hope that it is protected and always nice. If African countries had more money many of the troubles would not happen, just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheap calls to Sri Lanka</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/11/30/does-terrorism-have-an-economic-motive/comment-page-1/#comment-37754</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap calls to Sri Lanka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=926#comment-37754</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. Sri Lanka is lovely country and I hope that it is protected and always nice. If African countries had more money many of the troubles would not happen, just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. Sri Lanka is lovely country and I hope that it is protected and always nice. If African countries had more money many of the troubles would not happen, just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free gambling game on line</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/11/30/does-terrorism-have-an-economic-motive/comment-page-1/#comment-2382</link>
		<dc:creator>free gambling game on line</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=926#comment-2382</guid>
		<description>We can see lot of things in India which are related to war and violence but the thing is this that is their any solution of this Terrorism or violence and war and you can also say India and Pakistan.Yes. A solution to these perennial problems can be found in ancient knowledge of Vedic defence. Veda means pure knowledge. Because pure knowledge is non-religious and universal, the Vedic solution of Invincible Defence Technology can be universally applied by the followers all religious beliefs or non-believers for the benefit of humankind.So I think by all this we can change a little bit violence in India.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can see lot of things in India which are related to war and violence but the thing is this that is their any solution of this Terrorism or violence and war and you can also say India and Pakistan.Yes. A solution to these perennial problems can be found in ancient knowledge of Vedic defence. Veda means pure knowledge. Because pure knowledge is non-religious and universal, the Vedic solution of Invincible Defence Technology can be universally applied by the followers all religious beliefs or non-believers for the benefit of humankind.So I think by all this we can change a little bit violence in India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free gambling game on line</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/11/30/does-terrorism-have-an-economic-motive/comment-page-1/#comment-37753</link>
		<dc:creator>free gambling game on line</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=926#comment-37753</guid>
		<description>We can see lot of things in India which are related to war and violence but the thing is this that is their any solution of this Terrorism or violence and war and you can also say India and Pakistan.Yes. A solution to these perennial problems can be found in ancient knowledge of Vedic defence. Veda means pure knowledge. Because pure knowledge is non-religious and universal, the Vedic solution of Invincible Defence Technology can be universally applied by the followers all religious beliefs or non-believers for the benefit of humankind.So I think by all this we can change a little bit violence in India.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can see lot of things in India which are related to war and violence but the thing is this that is their any solution of this Terrorism or violence and war and you can also say India and Pakistan.Yes. A solution to these perennial problems can be found in ancient knowledge of Vedic defence. Veda means pure knowledge. Because pure knowledge is non-religious and universal, the Vedic solution of Invincible Defence Technology can be universally applied by the followers all religious beliefs or non-believers for the benefit of humankind.So I think by all this we can change a little bit violence in India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t Take Charity At Face Value&#8230;.It Sometimes Funds Terrorism : The Inspired Economist</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/11/30/does-terrorism-have-an-economic-motive/comment-page-1/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t Take Charity At Face Value&#8230;.It Sometimes Funds Terrorism : The Inspired Economist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=926#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>[...] can charity really be considered &#8220;charity&#8221; if in fact it funds terrorism? What kind of charitable organization works to save lives and better society on one hand yet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can charity really be considered &#8220;charity&#8221; if in fact it funds terrorism? What kind of charitable organization works to save lives and better society on one hand yet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMOPAL</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/11/30/does-terrorism-have-an-economic-motive/comment-page-1/#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator>SMOPAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=926#comment-1077</guid>
		<description>@Global Patriot: Well said about inequality distribution of capital and wealth but will you agree that If most of other religious followers give birth to 1 or 2 children will be richer or those specially muslims who give birth to 8-10 children.My wealth goes to my 2 children and theirs is distributed to 8-10 children. It is them to be blamed rather than to blame the whole system.This is the only root cause of their problems and nothing else. Their ageold 14th century teachings can not be adjusted with 21st century computer age and the young muslim masses who had been jealous of other religions try to blame others rather than introinspect their own dumb teachings and beleifs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Global Patriot: Well said about inequality distribution of capital and wealth but will you agree that If most of other religious followers give birth to 1 or 2 children will be richer or those specially muslims who give birth to 8-10 children.My wealth goes to my 2 children and theirs is distributed to 8-10 children. It is them to be blamed rather than to blame the whole system.This is the only root cause of their problems and nothing else. Their ageold 14th century teachings can not be adjusted with 21st century computer age and the young muslim masses who had been jealous of other religions try to blame others rather than introinspect their own dumb teachings and beleifs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMOPAL</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/11/30/does-terrorism-have-an-economic-motive/comment-page-1/#comment-37752</link>
		<dc:creator>SMOPAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=926#comment-37752</guid>
		<description>@Global Patriot: Well said about inequality distribution of capital and wealth but will you agree that If most of other religious followers give birth to 1 or 2 children will be richer or those specially muslims who give birth to 8-10 children.My wealth goes to my 2 children and theirs is distributed to 8-10 children. It is them to be blamed rather than to blame the whole system.This is the only root cause of their problems and nothing else. Their ageold 14th century teachings can not be adjusted with 21st century computer age and the young muslim masses who had been jealous of other religions try to blame others rather than introinspect their own dumb teachings and beleifs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Global Patriot: Well said about inequality distribution of capital and wealth but will you agree that If most of other religious followers give birth to 1 or 2 children will be richer or those specially muslims who give birth to 8-10 children.My wealth goes to my 2 children and theirs is distributed to 8-10 children. It is them to be blamed rather than to blame the whole system.This is the only root cause of their problems and nothing else. Their ageold 14th century teachings can not be adjusted with 21st century computer age and the young muslim masses who had been jealous of other religions try to blame others rather than introinspect their own dumb teachings and beleifs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Patriot</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/11/30/does-terrorism-have-an-economic-motive/comment-page-1/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=926#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>As this article presents in excellent fashion, the face of terrorism is multifaceted.  As such, the motivations are many and the interplay of motivations sometimes complex.  Religion and morals play a part, as does politics, culture and finance.

With regards to &quot;Does terror have an economic motive?&quot;

Most viewed the 9/11 attacks as an act of hatred directed toward Western capitalism with the intent of inflicting both human and economic damage.  While the human causalities were largely limited to the event itself, the economic effects will be with us for decades, if not forever.

From a different perspective, many throughout the world considered the invasion of Iraq a clear act of terrorism committed by the United States, with a motivation of greed and survival - there is lots of money to be made from the oil business, and without access to Middle East oil our country would collapse.

I find it interesting that in both cases capitalism is a key factor.  Not that capitalism itself is bad, but the ways in which capitalism is practiced have profound consequences on different societies and may not harmonize with their local customs, culture or religion.

One of the fundamental issues raised in the article concerns the growing spread between haves and have-nots which too often occurs whenever Western style capitalism is employed.  In many cases what the world sees is the rich getting richer while the poor are viewed as being trapped within a type of economic slavery.

Until we have capitalism with a heart, capitalism with a conscience, capitalism with social justice, capitalism with compassion, capitalism with respect - we will continue to breed resentment throughout the world.

That does not justify acts of terrorism as a valid response, but we do need to understand basic human nature, and there has always been a correlation between greed on the one hand, and violence on the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As this article presents in excellent fashion, the face of terrorism is multifaceted.  As such, the motivations are many and the interplay of motivations sometimes complex.  Religion and morals play a part, as does politics, culture and finance.</p>
<p>With regards to &#8220;Does terror have an economic motive?&#8221;</p>
<p>Most viewed the 9/11 attacks as an act of hatred directed toward Western capitalism with the intent of inflicting both human and economic damage.  While the human causalities were largely limited to the event itself, the economic effects will be with us for decades, if not forever.</p>
<p>From a different perspective, many throughout the world considered the invasion of Iraq a clear act of terrorism committed by the United States, with a motivation of greed and survival &#8211; there is lots of money to be made from the oil business, and without access to Middle East oil our country would collapse.</p>
<p>I find it interesting that in both cases capitalism is a key factor.  Not that capitalism itself is bad, but the ways in which capitalism is practiced have profound consequences on different societies and may not harmonize with their local customs, culture or religion.</p>
<p>One of the fundamental issues raised in the article concerns the growing spread between haves and have-nots which too often occurs whenever Western style capitalism is employed.  In many cases what the world sees is the rich getting richer while the poor are viewed as being trapped within a type of economic slavery.</p>
<p>Until we have capitalism with a heart, capitalism with a conscience, capitalism with social justice, capitalism with compassion, capitalism with respect &#8211; we will continue to breed resentment throughout the world.</p>
<p>That does not justify acts of terrorism as a valid response, but we do need to understand basic human nature, and there has always been a correlation between greed on the one hand, and violence on the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Patriot</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/11/30/does-terrorism-have-an-economic-motive/comment-page-1/#comment-37751</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Patriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=926#comment-37751</guid>
		<description>As this article presents in excellent fashion, the face of terrorism is multifaceted.  As such, the motivations are many and the interplay of motivations sometimes complex.  Religion and morals play a part, as does politics, culture and finance.

With regards to &quot;Does terror have an economic motive?&quot;

Most viewed the 9/11 attacks as an act of hatred directed toward Western capitalism with the intent of inflicting both human and economic damage.  While the human causalities were largely limited to the event itself, the economic effects will be with us for decades, if not forever.

From a different perspective, many throughout the world considered the invasion of Iraq a clear act of terrorism committed by the United States, with a motivation of greed and survival - there is lots of money to be made from the oil business, and without access to Middle East oil our country would collapse.

I find it interesting that in both cases capitalism is a key factor.  Not that capitalism itself is bad, but the ways in which capitalism is practiced have profound consequences on different societies and may not harmonize with their local customs, culture or religion.

One of the fundamental issues raised in the article concerns the growing spread between haves and have-nots which too often occurs whenever Western style capitalism is employed.  In many cases what the world sees is the rich getting richer while the poor are viewed as being trapped within a type of economic slavery.

Until we have capitalism with a heart, capitalism with a conscience, capitalism with social justice, capitalism with compassion, capitalism with respect - we will continue to breed resentment throughout the world.

That does not justify acts of terrorism as a valid response, but we do need to understand basic human nature, and there has always been a correlation between greed on the one hand, and violence on the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As this article presents in excellent fashion, the face of terrorism is multifaceted.  As such, the motivations are many and the interplay of motivations sometimes complex.  Religion and morals play a part, as does politics, culture and finance.</p>
<p>With regards to &#8220;Does terror have an economic motive?&#8221;</p>
<p>Most viewed the 9/11 attacks as an act of hatred directed toward Western capitalism with the intent of inflicting both human and economic damage.  While the human causalities were largely limited to the event itself, the economic effects will be with us for decades, if not forever.</p>
<p>From a different perspective, many throughout the world considered the invasion of Iraq a clear act of terrorism committed by the United States, with a motivation of greed and survival &#8211; there is lots of money to be made from the oil business, and without access to Middle East oil our country would collapse.</p>
<p>I find it interesting that in both cases capitalism is a key factor.  Not that capitalism itself is bad, but the ways in which capitalism is practiced have profound consequences on different societies and may not harmonize with their local customs, culture or religion.</p>
<p>One of the fundamental issues raised in the article concerns the growing spread between haves and have-nots which too often occurs whenever Western style capitalism is employed.  In many cases what the world sees is the rich getting richer while the poor are viewed as being trapped within a type of economic slavery.</p>
<p>Until we have capitalism with a heart, capitalism with a conscience, capitalism with social justice, capitalism with compassion, capitalism with respect &#8211; we will continue to breed resentment throughout the world.</p>
<p>That does not justify acts of terrorism as a valid response, but we do need to understand basic human nature, and there has always been a correlation between greed on the one hand, and violence on the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eniryt Manaen</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/11/30/does-terrorism-have-an-economic-motive/comment-page-1/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>Eniryt Manaen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=926#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>I feel like this article juxtaposes the terms prosperity and inequality in a confusing way. If I read the article correctly it seems that the premise starts off suggesting that terrorists are targeting prosperity both as a means to sabotage the resource base of “enemies” and because it represents an ideological target. The article then relates that perhaps extremists are motivated by inequality and are lashing out because of it. I think this article is insightful but confusing because of all the religious and cultural issues that are infused with any economic rational terrorists might have. I think we can mitigate some of these issues by examining terrorism as a tactic used by groups and move away from the term “terrorist’ (which has come to mean Islamic Fundamentalist groups who utilize terrorism).

If one looks more generally acts of terrorism by many unaffiliated groups have often had a basis in economics as well as ideology. On one side Terrorism in Northern Ireland, Sri Lanka, and Nepal all had both a political and economic basis. I am more inclined to believe that income equality through the empowerment of disenfranchised groups will do more to help than to simply “dream bigger” as Suketu Mehta suggests. Even well developed economies suffer under a worsening Gini Coefficient and have seen sporadic violence. While not an act of organized terrorism, the Los Angeles riots as well as the more recent unrest in Paris have shown that economic inequality and lack of opportunity can lead to civil unrest even in wealthy countries.

There is a bigger conversation here and I hope that we can start discussing the root causes of violence and hopefully find solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like this article juxtaposes the terms prosperity and inequality in a confusing way. If I read the article correctly it seems that the premise starts off suggesting that terrorists are targeting prosperity both as a means to sabotage the resource base of “enemies” and because it represents an ideological target. The article then relates that perhaps extremists are motivated by inequality and are lashing out because of it. I think this article is insightful but confusing because of all the religious and cultural issues that are infused with any economic rational terrorists might have. I think we can mitigate some of these issues by examining terrorism as a tactic used by groups and move away from the term “terrorist’ (which has come to mean Islamic Fundamentalist groups who utilize terrorism).</p>
<p>If one looks more generally acts of terrorism by many unaffiliated groups have often had a basis in economics as well as ideology. On one side Terrorism in Northern Ireland, Sri Lanka, and Nepal all had both a political and economic basis. I am more inclined to believe that income equality through the empowerment of disenfranchised groups will do more to help than to simply “dream bigger” as Suketu Mehta suggests. Even well developed economies suffer under a worsening Gini Coefficient and have seen sporadic violence. While not an act of organized terrorism, the Los Angeles riots as well as the more recent unrest in Paris have shown that economic inequality and lack of opportunity can lead to civil unrest even in wealthy countries.</p>
<p>There is a bigger conversation here and I hope that we can start discussing the root causes of violence and hopefully find solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

