<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Green Job Plan x 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/16/obamas-green-job-plan-x-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/16/obamas-green-job-plan-x-10/</link>
	<description>Discussing the people, ideas, and companies that redefine capitalism and inspire positive change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Jobs for Gangs</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/16/obamas-green-job-plan-x-10/comment-page-1/#comment-36770</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Jobs for Gangs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=983#comment-36770</guid>
		<description>[...] is a fantastic idea and something I suggested in an article I wrote titled &#8220;Obama&#8217;s Green Plan x 10&#8221; .   In the past nine years, the prison population has nearly doubled, as a direct result of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a fantastic idea and something I suggested in an article I wrote titled &#8220;Obama&#8217;s Green Plan x 10&#8221; .   In the past nine years, the prison population has nearly doubled, as a direct result of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan @ Survive Prison</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/16/obamas-green-job-plan-x-10/comment-page-1/#comment-24954</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan @ Survive Prison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=983#comment-24954</guid>
		<description>Pretty scary stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty scary stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan @ Survive Prison</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/16/obamas-green-job-plan-x-10/comment-page-1/#comment-37789</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan @ Survive Prison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=983#comment-37789</guid>
		<description>Pretty scary stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty scary stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: President Obama Is Regarded As A Green Messiah Given His Policies On Climate Change : The Inspired Economist</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/16/obamas-green-job-plan-x-10/comment-page-1/#comment-3822</link>
		<dc:creator>President Obama Is Regarded As A Green Messiah Given His Policies On Climate Change : The Inspired Economist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=983#comment-3822</guid>
		<description>[...] warming legislation. The good news is that we can achieve these goals while growing the economy, creating jobs and completely phasing out coal and other dirty energy sources. In fact, solving the economic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] warming legislation. The good news is that we can achieve these goals while growing the economy, creating jobs and completely phasing out coal and other dirty energy sources. In fact, solving the economic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuclio</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/16/obamas-green-job-plan-x-10/comment-page-1/#comment-2952</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuclio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 03:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=983#comment-2952</guid>
		<description>Nice article, and plan. Simple but powerful in it&#039;s potential. 

Although nobody &quot;wants&quot; to pay more for gas,I agree the gas tax is an important component of any strategic shift to an alternative energy society/economy. 

The fact that people don&#039;t like it, is the reason why it&#039;s so important. 

First the tax creates some of the money for investment, and simultaneously creates an incentive to adopt the output created by the investment. It is a self reinforcing mechanism, a positive feedback loop. This is necessary in a major transition and why you also need gov&#039;t intervention. 

Just look at how the drop in oil prices has been devastating to the alt energy industry, because they can only be funded by the private sector if there is a &quot;spread&quot; or if there is value to the alternative.  Just getting cleaner air and saving our planets finite resources for future generations is not enough for humans unfortunately. 

Also if folks knew that what they are paying is not going to fund terrorists but is the best investment we can make for our future, it could be spun to pass. Especially with Obama in office. 

The devil is in the details of course, but if we are serious about the shift... the tax idea should be debated and researched further. 

In regards the size of investment... If America or really the world wants to dig itself out of the hole that it&#039;s currently in, and drive the world to the next level it needs to produce something extraordinary. Something that everyone wants and needs. A renewable source of energy would fit that description. If we want this to happen anytime soon it has to be funded, like we mean it and it has to be a worldwide initiative. We&#039;re all in this together. 

The side benefit of a true shift to alt energy is that it should also unwind tensions with the middle east. While THEY have what WE need for survival(oil), there will never be peace, we will kill each other to control it. By shifting to alt energy, they lose leverage, we in turn don&#039;t feel threatened and screw with them...tension should decrease. Diffusing the negative feedback loop. 

Anyway we need to save the oil, because we&#039;ll still need it for some time even if we find solutions for basic electricity and personal transport. As there are some things that still would require fossil fuels and it&#039;s not a finite resource.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, and plan. Simple but powerful in it&#8217;s potential. </p>
<p>Although nobody &#8220;wants&#8221; to pay more for gas,I agree the gas tax is an important component of any strategic shift to an alternative energy society/economy. </p>
<p>The fact that people don&#8217;t like it, is the reason why it&#8217;s so important. </p>
<p>First the tax creates some of the money for investment, and simultaneously creates an incentive to adopt the output created by the investment. It is a self reinforcing mechanism, a positive feedback loop. This is necessary in a major transition and why you also need gov&#8217;t intervention. </p>
<p>Just look at how the drop in oil prices has been devastating to the alt energy industry, because they can only be funded by the private sector if there is a &#8220;spread&#8221; or if there is value to the alternative.  Just getting cleaner air and saving our planets finite resources for future generations is not enough for humans unfortunately. </p>
<p>Also if folks knew that what they are paying is not going to fund terrorists but is the best investment we can make for our future, it could be spun to pass. Especially with Obama in office. </p>
<p>The devil is in the details of course, but if we are serious about the shift&#8230; the tax idea should be debated and researched further. </p>
<p>In regards the size of investment&#8230; If America or really the world wants to dig itself out of the hole that it&#8217;s currently in, and drive the world to the next level it needs to produce something extraordinary. Something that everyone wants and needs. A renewable source of energy would fit that description. If we want this to happen anytime soon it has to be funded, like we mean it and it has to be a worldwide initiative. We&#8217;re all in this together. </p>
<p>The side benefit of a true shift to alt energy is that it should also unwind tensions with the middle east. While THEY have what WE need for survival(oil), there will never be peace, we will kill each other to control it. By shifting to alt energy, they lose leverage, we in turn don&#8217;t feel threatened and screw with them&#8230;tension should decrease. Diffusing the negative feedback loop. </p>
<p>Anyway we need to save the oil, because we&#8217;ll still need it for some time even if we find solutions for basic electricity and personal transport. As there are some things that still would require fossil fuels and it&#8217;s not a finite resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuclio</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/16/obamas-green-job-plan-x-10/comment-page-1/#comment-37788</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuclio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 03:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=983#comment-37788</guid>
		<description>Nice article, and plan. Simple but powerful in it&#039;s potential. 

Although nobody &quot;wants&quot; to pay more for gas,I agree the gas tax is an important component of any strategic shift to an alternative energy society/economy. 

The fact that people don&#039;t like it, is the reason why it&#039;s so important. 

First the tax creates some of the money for investment, and simultaneously creates an incentive to adopt the output created by the investment. It is a self reinforcing mechanism, a positive feedback loop. This is necessary in a major transition and why you also need gov&#039;t intervention. 

Just look at how the drop in oil prices has been devastating to the alt energy industry, because they can only be funded by the private sector if there is a &quot;spread&quot; or if there is value to the alternative.  Just getting cleaner air and saving our planets finite resources for future generations is not enough for humans unfortunately. 

Also if folks knew that what they are paying is not going to fund terrorists but is the best investment we can make for our future, it could be spun to pass. Especially with Obama in office. 

The devil is in the details of course, but if we are serious about the shift... the tax idea should be debated and researched further. 

In regards the size of investment... If America or really the world wants to dig itself out of the hole that it&#039;s currently in, and drive the world to the next level it needs to produce something extraordinary. Something that everyone wants and needs. A renewable source of energy would fit that description. If we want this to happen anytime soon it has to be funded, like we mean it and it has to be a worldwide initiative. We&#039;re all in this together. 

The side benefit of a true shift to alt energy is that it should also unwind tensions with the middle east. While THEY have what WE need for survival(oil), there will never be peace, we will kill each other to control it. By shifting to alt energy, they lose leverage, we in turn don&#039;t feel threatened and screw with them...tension should decrease. Diffusing the negative feedback loop. 

Anyway we need to save the oil, because we&#039;ll still need it for some time even if we find solutions for basic electricity and personal transport. As there are some things that still would require fossil fuels and it&#039;s not a finite resource.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, and plan. Simple but powerful in it&#8217;s potential. </p>
<p>Although nobody &#8220;wants&#8221; to pay more for gas,I agree the gas tax is an important component of any strategic shift to an alternative energy society/economy. </p>
<p>The fact that people don&#8217;t like it, is the reason why it&#8217;s so important. </p>
<p>First the tax creates some of the money for investment, and simultaneously creates an incentive to adopt the output created by the investment. It is a self reinforcing mechanism, a positive feedback loop. This is necessary in a major transition and why you also need gov&#8217;t intervention. </p>
<p>Just look at how the drop in oil prices has been devastating to the alt energy industry, because they can only be funded by the private sector if there is a &#8220;spread&#8221; or if there is value to the alternative.  Just getting cleaner air and saving our planets finite resources for future generations is not enough for humans unfortunately. </p>
<p>Also if folks knew that what they are paying is not going to fund terrorists but is the best investment we can make for our future, it could be spun to pass. Especially with Obama in office. </p>
<p>The devil is in the details of course, but if we are serious about the shift&#8230; the tax idea should be debated and researched further. </p>
<p>In regards the size of investment&#8230; If America or really the world wants to dig itself out of the hole that it&#8217;s currently in, and drive the world to the next level it needs to produce something extraordinary. Something that everyone wants and needs. A renewable source of energy would fit that description. If we want this to happen anytime soon it has to be funded, like we mean it and it has to be a worldwide initiative. We&#8217;re all in this together. </p>
<p>The side benefit of a true shift to alt energy is that it should also unwind tensions with the middle east. While THEY have what WE need for survival(oil), there will never be peace, we will kill each other to control it. By shifting to alt energy, they lose leverage, we in turn don&#8217;t feel threatened and screw with them&#8230;tension should decrease. Diffusing the negative feedback loop. </p>
<p>Anyway we need to save the oil, because we&#8217;ll still need it for some time even if we find solutions for basic electricity and personal transport. As there are some things that still would require fossil fuels and it&#8217;s not a finite resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/16/obamas-green-job-plan-x-10/comment-page-1/#comment-2943</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=983#comment-2943</guid>
		<description>A new gas tax would be counter productive to the economy as prices rebound and start to rise. The catalyst for the down turn in the economy was the fast rise in energy prices and trickled though out the rest of the economy.
Bring home the troops would not save the tax payer&#039;s $188 billion dollars. The better part of that amount would still be needed to support those troops if they were here in the US. The obligations the country has to those troops and to a foreign policy would not just go away.
Train the criminals for free and release them into the public sector while millions of law abiding citizens are unemployed and they would have to pay to be trained? Other than changing the prisons back to prisons and cutting cost there, this idea is too stupid to even comment on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new gas tax would be counter productive to the economy as prices rebound and start to rise. The catalyst for the down turn in the economy was the fast rise in energy prices and trickled though out the rest of the economy.<br />
Bring home the troops would not save the tax payer&#8217;s $188 billion dollars. The better part of that amount would still be needed to support those troops if they were here in the US. The obligations the country has to those troops and to a foreign policy would not just go away.<br />
Train the criminals for free and release them into the public sector while millions of law abiding citizens are unemployed and they would have to pay to be trained? Other than changing the prisons back to prisons and cutting cost there, this idea is too stupid to even comment on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/16/obamas-green-job-plan-x-10/comment-page-1/#comment-37787</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=983#comment-37787</guid>
		<description>A new gas tax would be counter productive to the economy as prices rebound and start to rise. The catalyst for the down turn in the economy was the fast rise in energy prices and trickled though out the rest of the economy.
Bring home the troops would not save the tax payer&#039;s $188 billion dollars. The better part of that amount would still be needed to support those troops if they were here in the US. The obligations the country has to those troops and to a foreign policy would not just go away.
Train the criminals for free and release them into the public sector while millions of law abiding citizens are unemployed and they would have to pay to be trained? Other than changing the prisons back to prisons and cutting cost there, this idea is too stupid to even comment on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new gas tax would be counter productive to the economy as prices rebound and start to rise. The catalyst for the down turn in the economy was the fast rise in energy prices and trickled though out the rest of the economy.<br />
Bring home the troops would not save the tax payer&#8217;s $188 billion dollars. The better part of that amount would still be needed to support those troops if they were here in the US. The obligations the country has to those troops and to a foreign policy would not just go away.<br />
Train the criminals for free and release them into the public sector while millions of law abiding citizens are unemployed and they would have to pay to be trained? Other than changing the prisons back to prisons and cutting cost there, this idea is too stupid to even comment on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHARKRIDE</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/16/obamas-green-job-plan-x-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1583</link>
		<dc:creator>SHARKRIDE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=983#comment-1583</guid>
		<description>[...] As part of the Inspired Economist&#8217;s plan to create 25 million new green jobs within 3-5 years, and to reduce ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As part of the Inspired Economist&#8217;s plan to create 25 million new green jobs within 3-5 years, and to reduce &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Biden Stole My Quote! : The Inspired Economist</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/16/obamas-green-job-plan-x-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1571</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Biden Stole My Quote! : The Inspired Economist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 14:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=983#comment-1571</guid>
		<description>[...] a recent article on the &#8220;Inspired Economist&#8220;, I detail a $150 billion plan that creates 25 million jobs and reduces the budget deficit by $100 billion.  Biden and Obama&#8217;s back of the napkin plan, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a recent article on the &#8220;Inspired Economist&#8220;, I detail a $150 billion plan that creates 25 million jobs and reduces the budget deficit by $100 billion.  Biden and Obama&#8217;s back of the napkin plan, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

