<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slumdog Millionaire: Was It A Real Win For India?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/23/slumdog-millionaire-was-it-a-real-win-for-india/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/23/slumdog-millionaire-was-it-a-real-win-for-india/</link>
	<description>Discussing the people, ideas, and companies that redefine capitalism and inspire positive change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eniryt Manaen</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/23/slumdog-millionaire-was-it-a-real-win-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-3656</link>
		<dc:creator>Eniryt Manaen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=1246#comment-3656</guid>
		<description>Can someone explain what the concept of &quot;poverty porn&quot; is exactly? I am afraid I simply don&#039;t understand the critique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain what the concept of &#8220;poverty porn&#8221; is exactly? I am afraid I simply don&#8217;t understand the critique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eniryt Manaen</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/23/slumdog-millionaire-was-it-a-real-win-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-37930</link>
		<dc:creator>Eniryt Manaen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=1246#comment-37930</guid>
		<description>Can someone explain what the concept of &quot;poverty porn&quot; is exactly? I am afraid I simply don&#039;t understand the critique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain what the concept of &#8220;poverty porn&#8221; is exactly? I am afraid I simply don&#8217;t understand the critique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelli</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/23/slumdog-millionaire-was-it-a-real-win-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-3622</link>
		<dc:creator>kelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=1246#comment-3622</guid>
		<description>I hope more articles like this are published and discussed in the days and months to come.  Art is often provocative and if this movies serves to open up the dialogue and create awareness for the culture behind an emerging super power, than this film more than deserves the praise that is being heaped on its creators and participants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope more articles like this are published and discussed in the days and months to come.  Art is often provocative and if this movies serves to open up the dialogue and create awareness for the culture behind an emerging super power, than this film more than deserves the praise that is being heaped on its creators and participants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelli</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/23/slumdog-millionaire-was-it-a-real-win-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-37929</link>
		<dc:creator>kelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=1246#comment-37929</guid>
		<description>I hope more articles like this are published and discussed in the days and months to come.  Art is often provocative and if this movies serves to open up the dialogue and create awareness for the culture behind an emerging super power, than this film more than deserves the praise that is being heaped on its creators and participants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope more articles like this are published and discussed in the days and months to come.  Art is often provocative and if this movies serves to open up the dialogue and create awareness for the culture behind an emerging super power, than this film more than deserves the praise that is being heaped on its creators and participants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reenita Malhotra</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/23/slumdog-millionaire-was-it-a-real-win-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-3613</link>
		<dc:creator>Reenita Malhotra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=1246#comment-3613</guid>
		<description>Ashwin,

Don&#039;t get me wrong - I love the movie, and I as I mentioned, I do believe that the filmmakers have done the research and made the movie to intentionally provoke. Which is the very purpose of art. 

I do not for a moment suggest or &#039;demand&#039; that it is up to the filmmakers to put the kids through school. But one cannot pass of the movie as enjoyable fiction without understanding the reality that these child actors will go back to a life of disease and unhygenic conditions in Dharavi having been paid a pittance salary compared to that stipulated by industry standards.  As you said, the &quot;objectional things in the movie are reality.&quot; The kids are after all...slumdogs. 

I am not concerned about &quot;what the world will think of India.&quot; Rather glad that they have a window to its truth.  But I am conscious...deeply conscious of the &#039;slumdog&#039; reaching recognition only through the glitz of an Oscar...soon to be pushed into the background when the next blockbuster film grabs everyone&#039;s attention. 

Hollywood is a fickle place. Let&#039;s not become lackadaisical about what this brilliant movie had exposed to the world at large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashwin,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I love the movie, and I as I mentioned, I do believe that the filmmakers have done the research and made the movie to intentionally provoke. Which is the very purpose of art. </p>
<p>I do not for a moment suggest or &#8216;demand&#8217; that it is up to the filmmakers to put the kids through school. But one cannot pass of the movie as enjoyable fiction without understanding the reality that these child actors will go back to a life of disease and unhygenic conditions in Dharavi having been paid a pittance salary compared to that stipulated by industry standards.  As you said, the &#8220;objectional things in the movie are reality.&#8221; The kids are after all&#8230;slumdogs. </p>
<p>I am not concerned about &#8220;what the world will think of India.&#8221; Rather glad that they have a window to its truth.  But I am conscious&#8230;deeply conscious of the &#8216;slumdog&#8217; reaching recognition only through the glitz of an Oscar&#8230;soon to be pushed into the background when the next blockbuster film grabs everyone&#8217;s attention. </p>
<p>Hollywood is a fickle place. Let&#8217;s not become lackadaisical about what this brilliant movie had exposed to the world at large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reenita Malhotra</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/23/slumdog-millionaire-was-it-a-real-win-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-37928</link>
		<dc:creator>Reenita Malhotra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=1246#comment-37928</guid>
		<description>Ashwin,

Don&#039;t get me wrong - I love the movie, and I as I mentioned, I do believe that the filmmakers have done the research and made the movie to intentionally provoke. Which is the very purpose of art. 

I do not for a moment suggest or &#039;demand&#039; that it is up to the filmmakers to put the kids through school. But one cannot pass of the movie as enjoyable fiction without understanding the reality that these child actors will go back to a life of disease and unhygenic conditions in Dharavi having been paid a pittance salary compared to that stipulated by industry standards.  As you said, the &quot;objectional things in the movie are reality.&quot; The kids are after all...slumdogs. 

I am not concerned about &quot;what the world will think of India.&quot; Rather glad that they have a window to its truth.  But I am conscious...deeply conscious of the &#039;slumdog&#039; reaching recognition only through the glitz of an Oscar...soon to be pushed into the background when the next blockbuster film grabs everyone&#039;s attention. 

Hollywood is a fickle place. Let&#039;s not become lackadaisical about what this brilliant movie had exposed to the world at large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashwin,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I love the movie, and I as I mentioned, I do believe that the filmmakers have done the research and made the movie to intentionally provoke. Which is the very purpose of art. </p>
<p>I do not for a moment suggest or &#8216;demand&#8217; that it is up to the filmmakers to put the kids through school. But one cannot pass of the movie as enjoyable fiction without understanding the reality that these child actors will go back to a life of disease and unhygenic conditions in Dharavi having been paid a pittance salary compared to that stipulated by industry standards.  As you said, the &#8220;objectional things in the movie are reality.&#8221; The kids are after all&#8230;slumdogs. </p>
<p>I am not concerned about &#8220;what the world will think of India.&#8221; Rather glad that they have a window to its truth.  But I am conscious&#8230;deeply conscious of the &#8216;slumdog&#8217; reaching recognition only through the glitz of an Oscar&#8230;soon to be pushed into the background when the next blockbuster film grabs everyone&#8217;s attention. </p>
<p>Hollywood is a fickle place. Let&#8217;s not become lackadaisical about what this brilliant movie had exposed to the world at large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashwin</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/23/slumdog-millionaire-was-it-a-real-win-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-3608</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=1246#comment-3608</guid>
		<description>The title of your article, &quot;Slumdog Millionaire: Was It A Real Win For India?&quot;, honestly, is worrying me. I truly admire your writing skills and the clarity of thought you have portrayed. But what i fail to understand is, Why relate a movie to the &#039;glorification&#039; of India or individuals to this movie? Its just fiction! Isnt it? The so-called &#039;objectional&#039; things in the movie are reality. If we were really against them highlighting or filming that part of our society, then why did we grant them permission to film? Oh, if we dont, will effect our global, social image?

I m sure you will agree that if this low-budget movie had go the acclaim it has, we probably wudnt have been talking about it. Why are we so sensitive to issue that only lead to gr8 intellectual discussion. If we are really concerned about the prestige or the kids going back to the slums; can we do anything for them? may be giv them some education and get them into good acting schools? Why shud we demand the crew of Slumdog Millionaires to take that responsibility. They were only supposed to pay for the services they got whithout violating the rules. If they have mistreated the children then lets take them to task. Else, lets just enjoy the movie and treat it as only fiction and not get carried away with what they (or the world) will think of India. If you are really concerned. Make an effort, publish it here. We want to join you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title of your article, &#8220;Slumdog Millionaire: Was It A Real Win For India?&#8221;, honestly, is worrying me. I truly admire your writing skills and the clarity of thought you have portrayed. But what i fail to understand is, Why relate a movie to the &#8216;glorification&#8217; of India or individuals to this movie? Its just fiction! Isnt it? The so-called &#8216;objectional&#8217; things in the movie are reality. If we were really against them highlighting or filming that part of our society, then why did we grant them permission to film? Oh, if we dont, will effect our global, social image?</p>
<p>I m sure you will agree that if this low-budget movie had go the acclaim it has, we probably wudnt have been talking about it. Why are we so sensitive to issue that only lead to gr8 intellectual discussion. If we are really concerned about the prestige or the kids going back to the slums; can we do anything for them? may be giv them some education and get them into good acting schools? Why shud we demand the crew of Slumdog Millionaires to take that responsibility. They were only supposed to pay for the services they got whithout violating the rules. If they have mistreated the children then lets take them to task. Else, lets just enjoy the movie and treat it as only fiction and not get carried away with what they (or the world) will think of India. If you are really concerned. Make an effort, publish it here. We want to join you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashwin</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/23/slumdog-millionaire-was-it-a-real-win-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-37927</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=1246#comment-37927</guid>
		<description>The title of your article, &quot;Slumdog Millionaire: Was It A Real Win For India?&quot;, honestly, is worrying me. I truly admire your writing skills and the clarity of thought you have portrayed. But what i fail to understand is, Why relate a movie to the &#039;glorification&#039; of India or individuals to this movie? Its just fiction! Isnt it? The so-called &#039;objectional&#039; things in the movie are reality. If we were really against them highlighting or filming that part of our society, then why did we grant them permission to film? Oh, if we dont, will effect our global, social image?

I m sure you will agree that if this low-budget movie had go the acclaim it has, we probably wudnt have been talking about it. Why are we so sensitive to issue that only lead to gr8 intellectual discussion. If we are really concerned about the prestige or the kids going back to the slums; can we do anything for them? may be giv them some education and get them into good acting schools? Why shud we demand the crew of Slumdog Millionaires to take that responsibility. They were only supposed to pay for the services they got whithout violating the rules. If they have mistreated the children then lets take them to task. Else, lets just enjoy the movie and treat it as only fiction and not get carried away with what they (or the world) will think of India. If you are really concerned. Make an effort, publish it here. We want to join you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title of your article, &#8220;Slumdog Millionaire: Was It A Real Win For India?&#8221;, honestly, is worrying me. I truly admire your writing skills and the clarity of thought you have portrayed. But what i fail to understand is, Why relate a movie to the &#8216;glorification&#8217; of India or individuals to this movie? Its just fiction! Isnt it? The so-called &#8216;objectional&#8217; things in the movie are reality. If we were really against them highlighting or filming that part of our society, then why did we grant them permission to film? Oh, if we dont, will effect our global, social image?</p>
<p>I m sure you will agree that if this low-budget movie had go the acclaim it has, we probably wudnt have been talking about it. Why are we so sensitive to issue that only lead to gr8 intellectual discussion. If we are really concerned about the prestige or the kids going back to the slums; can we do anything for them? may be giv them some education and get them into good acting schools? Why shud we demand the crew of Slumdog Millionaires to take that responsibility. They were only supposed to pay for the services they got whithout violating the rules. If they have mistreated the children then lets take them to task. Else, lets just enjoy the movie and treat it as only fiction and not get carried away with what they (or the world) will think of India. If you are really concerned. Make an effort, publish it here. We want to join you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reenita Malhotra</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/23/slumdog-millionaire-was-it-a-real-win-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-3587</link>
		<dc:creator>Reenita Malhotra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=1246#comment-3587</guid>
		<description>And here is the view from India:

http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/127845/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here is the view from India:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/127845/" rel="nofollow">http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/127845/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reenita Malhotra</title>
		<link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/02/23/slumdog-millionaire-was-it-a-real-win-for-india/comment-page-1/#comment-37926</link>
		<dc:creator>Reenita Malhotra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/?p=1246#comment-37926</guid>
		<description>And here is the view from India:

http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/127845/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here is the view from India:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/127845/" rel="nofollow">http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/127845/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

