Would you spend your entire solar marketing budget on a World Cup sponsorship?

YingliThe FIFA World Cup has come to an end with Spain crowned as the champions for the first time in their country’s history. The play in the final was less than inspiring, but the event was not without its interesting stories. One of those stories was about a Chinese solar company joining the ranks of Budweiser, Castrol, Continental and McDonalds as official sponsors of the sporting event.

That company is Yingli Solar as a visit to their web site makes clear. As a sponsor, they received at least eight digital billboards during each of the 64 World Cup matches, as you can see here in a company photo. I noticed it a few times, did you?

But the bigger questions are: how much money did they spend and was it worth it? Although the company has declined to state the exact amount of the spend, there are a few clues.

They spent how much?

Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF, subscription required) asked a similar question to Judy Tzeng Lee, Yingli’s director of corporate development for an article titled “Great strike or own goal for solar manufacturer”?” Here’s an excerpt:

Lee declined to say exactly how much Yingli spent on its sponsorship, but said that nearly all of the company’s 2010 marketing budget will go toward its World Cup efforts. Marketing will be about 2% of Yingli’s 2010 projected revenue, she added.

Based on the firm’s projected 950-1,000MW of shipments for the year and assuming an approximate $2/W price, Yingli’s total spend could easily total $30-40m.

IEG, who apparently helped FIFA prepare their sponsorship packages, put the cost of Yingli’s sponsorship at $10-25m, according to an article in Business Management.

BNEF thought the presence of a clean energy company as world Cup sponsor no doubt signals the sector has achieved a certain degree of size and maturity, but they wondered if it was worth it given the niche audience that Yingli is targeting. A week before the Cup ended, Helena Kimball, head of marketing communications at the San Francisco office of Yingli Green Energy Americas, told the New York Times that the company planned “to do a complete analysis” after the World Cup to determine whether the sponsorship achieved its goals. Ms. Kimball noted that traffic to the Yingli Web increased so dramatically that it crashed a few times.

Was it worth it?

Yesterday, the company said that the World Cup sponsorship helped it a secure a potential credit facility of 36bn Yuan ($5.3bn) from the state-owned Hebei Branch of China Development Bank. Once details are ironed out and the deal is finalized, the credit facility will support Yingli Group’s PV related businesses in China and overseas.

BNEF noted that Yingli’s shares declined 6% the day the sponsorship was announced and were down nearly 22% since the announcement. However, their stock actually didn’t decline as steeply as other large publicly-traded solar companies over that same period.

So what do you think? If you were the Chief Marketing Officer for a company manufacturing solar PV cells and modules, would you recommend spending your entire year’s marketing budget on a sponsorship of the World Cup?

Written by Nathan Schock

Nathan is the director of public relations for POET, the largest producer of biofuels in the world. He is also a digital advocate of sustainability and corporate social responsibility. He wants to help communicators improve their delivery of this information to the public in order to drive social change. Although he monitors communications from all sectors, his primary focus is business, because it it the only institution with the resources necessary to implement the lasting changes needed to preserve and protect the environment. You can read his latest thoughts at


Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


BP is the 4th Most Profitable Company in the World

AF&PA: The Paper Industry Is Making Huge Strides