{"id":1287,"date":"2009-03-09T13:35:07","date_gmt":"2009-03-09T13:35:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ietransfer.wpengine.com\/?p=1287"},"modified":"2009-03-09T13:35:07","modified_gmt":"2009-03-09T13:35:07","slug":"greening-print-marketing-whats-your-mails-carbon-footprint","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/inspiredeconomist.com\/articles\/greening-print-marketing-whats-your-mails-carbon-footprint\/","title":{"rendered":"Greening Print Marketing: What’s Your Mail’s Carbon Footprint?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a> Mail is a small overall contribution to a consumer’s environmental footprint. After all, according to a Pitney Bowes study on the environmental impact of mail, paper is increasingly manufactured from renewable resources, paper companies are increasingly running on renewable energy and running a single refrigerator for a year creates the same carbon footprint of delivering 5,000 letters.<\/p>\n

At the same time \u2014 I would counter \u2014 direct mailers, catalogers, and others who produce massive volumes of mail can make a huge environmental difference (especially corporately) by making small, incremental changes individually. Simply because<\/em> of those volumes. Once we start making changes at the source, the impact of the effort is magnified.<\/p>\n

Here are some interesting nutshells from the report:<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n